experiment:encoding-quality

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
experiment:encoding-quality [2021/01/25 00:50] – [Table] ischluffexperiment:encoding-quality [2021/04/15 13:36] (current) ischluff
Line 5: Line 5:
 Reference content is either our own (https://media.ccc.de) or from Xiph (https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/). Reference content is either our own (https://media.ccc.de) or from Xiph (https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/).
  
-The specific sources are found in https://github.com/voc/vmaf-docker/blob/master/data/sources.json+The specific sources are found in https://github.com/voc/voctoquality/blob/master/data/sources.json
  
 All the reference content is converted to 8bit 1080p25. All the reference content is converted to 8bit 1080p25.
Line 18: Line 18:
 The codec settings are the ones currently in use by the C3VOC for live streaming. The codec settings are the ones currently in use by the C3VOC for live streaming.
  
-See https://github.com/voc/vmaf-docker/blob/master/data/libquality/profiles/voc_streaming.py for the specific ffmpeg options.+See https://github.com/voc/voctoquality/blob/master/data/profiles/voc_streaming.py for the specific ffmpeg options.
  
 The codecs are tested with bitrates from 1Mbit/s to 5.2Mbit/s. The codecs are tested with bitrates from 1Mbit/s to 5.2Mbit/s.
Line 29: Line 29:
 ==== Comments ==== ==== Comments ====
  
-^ Platform                                         ^ Label        ^ Hardware Codecs    ^ Comments                                                                                                                                            +^ Platform                                         ^ Label        ^ Hardware Codecs    ^ Comments                                                                                                                                                        
-^ Intel 6th Gen (i7-6600U)                         | skylake      | h.264, h.265       | h.264 scores better than our VP9 and x264 streaming settings and is pretty fast\\ h.265 even scores a little bit higher but is considerably slower  +^ Intel 6th Gen (i7-6600U)                         | skylake      | h.264, h.265       | h.264 scores better than our VP9 and x264 streaming settings and is pretty fast\\ h.265 even scores a little bit higher but is considerably slower              
-^ Intel 8th Gen (i7-8665U)                         | whiskeylake  | h.264, h.265, VP9  | h.264 and h.265 results are identical to skylake\\ VP9 scores worse than H.264 and has broken rate-control for <2mbit/                            +^ Intel 8th Gen (i7-8665U)                         | whiskeylake  | h.264, h.265, VP9  | h.264 and h.265 results worse but faster than skylake, have to check whats up with that\\ VP9 scores worse than H.264 and has broken rate-control for <2mbit/ 
-^ AMD Navi (RX 5700 XT) + Ryzen 2nd Gen (R5-2600)  | navi10       | h.264, h.265       | h.264 is worse than x264 on veryfast...\\ h.265 produces 1920x1088 output?                                                                          +^ AMD Navi (RX 5700 XT) + Ryzen 2nd Gen (R5-2600)  | navi10       | h.264, h.265       | h.264 is worse than x264 on veryfast...\\ h.265 produces 1920x1088 output?                                                                                      
-^ Nvidia Turing (RTX2080 Super)                    | turing       | h.264, h.265       | nvidia-driver-460, cuda-toolkit 9.1.85\\ best h.265 encode, h.264 behind Intel                                                                      |+^ Nvidia Turing (RTX2080 Super)                    | turing       | h.264, h.265       | nvidia-driver-460, cuda-toolkit 9.1.85\\ best h.265 encode, h.264 behind Intel                                                                                  |
  
  
  • experiment/encoding-quality.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/04/15 13:36
  • by ischluff